|
- August 2004 -
Cleveland County Positive and Negative Economic
Impact Reports Completed by UNC-Chapel Hill
Results Discussed at Economic Development Council
Meeting on August 9, 2004
(Cleveland County, NC) -- The Cleveland County
Chamber and University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
are unveiling the results of two studies that
measure the negative economic impact of lost jobs as
well as the positive economic impact of new
industrial investment and job creation in Cleveland
County.
The
Economic Development Council met at 3 p.m. on
Monday, August 9 at the Charles F. Harry
Administrative Building in Shelby to hear the
results of both reports. Officials with UNC-Chapel
Hill examined a variety of factors relating to the
Cleveland County economy. According to leaders,
this is the first report of its kind generated to
study the economic impact of job losses in a
specific county of the state.
“The
meeting provided an opportunity for local citizens
and public sector leaders to hear this crucial
information and more fully understand what we can do
to bring economic prosperity to Cleveland County,”
said Chamber President Stuart Gilbert of the
reports. “In addition, the material presented does
more to quantify the economic crisis we are in than
anything else I have seen. This is a compelling
reason for intensifying our economic development
public/private partnership and support.”
Each of
the reports utilize IMPLAN software, which measures
the multiplier effect of both job losses and gains.
The negative economic impact report measures a
variety of elements that led to job losses, and how
those losses have financially impacted the local
economy. In addition, the report provides detailed
information on how Cleveland County ranks in
comparison to other counties in the region as well
as to the state average in several areas.
According to Dr. Michael Luger, Professor of Public
Policy, Business, and Planning for the Carolina
Center for Competitive Economies (C3E) at UNC-Chapel
Hill, the Chamber’s proactive response to the
economic situation is particularly promising.
“Rather than blaming the problem on free trade or
other external factors, the leadership at the
Chamber has simply asked ‘what can we do’ to create
more and better jobs,” said Luger. “They have put
forward an ambitious program of recruitment and
expansion in targeted industries that our analysis
shows will indeed restore economic vitality if
successful.”
The
positive economic impact study examines how the
Economic Development Plan of Action would affect the
county, assuming the goals for investment and job
creation are achieved. Both reports include direct,
indirect, and induced effects on the economy, and
not surprisingly, the negative impact study’s
results show exponential losses with an estimated
5,552 job-years, over $637.5 million in output, and
$175 million in labor income have been lost in
Cleveland County due to plant closings and business
downsizing between 2001 and 2003.
“The
change in demand is caused by the loss of payroll
and output in the Cleveland County economy resulting
from plant closings and business downsizing,” the
report states. “The implicit assumption in the
model is that direct, indirect, and induced losses
would not have occurred in the absence of plant
closings and business downsizing.”
By the
same token, similar benefits are also discussed in
the positive economic impact model. Since February
of 2003, the Cleveland County Chamber’s Economic
Development division has assisted in the generation
of over $75 million in new investment (both existing
and new industry projects) and the creation of 750
new jobs. The positive impact study reviews the
Economic Development division’s strategic goal of
$500 million in new investment and over 2,500 new
jobs over the next several years, and the impact of
such investment in the county.
“Various
economic challenges require an aggressive response
from local leaders,” the report states. “The
leadership of the Cleveland County Chamber is
developing an economic strategy to position the
county to be competitive in the 21st
century-knowledge economy.”
Scott
Darnell, Senior VP for Economic Development at the
Chamber believes the reports provide community
leaders with a compelling reason to continue to work
as a team with regard to economic development
efforts in Cleveland County. “In order to achieve
our $500 million investment goal, we need full
support from the private sector,” said Darnell.
“Not only do these reports show that we are on the
right track, but that our failures and successes up
to this point share a strong correlation. We are in
a better position to capitalize on our strengths and
tackle our weaknesses.”
Chamber
board chairman David Faunce says now is the time for
citizens and businesses to support the efforts of
the Chamber. “Without question, the Cleveland
County Chamber is the catalyst for economic
development,” said Faunce. “By supporting the
Chamber through a new membership or additional
involvement, every business can help our community.
We must increase the job opportunities for the
thousands of unemployed and underemployed citizens
throughout Cleveland County.” |